Learn why AI chatbots hallucinate, why that’s risky for nonprofits, and how Telecom4Good AI Assistants answer only from approved nonprofit content.
Posted on Tuestday, December 16, 2025
How nonprofits can use AI without risking made-up answers,
confused constituents, or broken trust
Imagine a parent visits your nonprofit website at 10:30 PM looking for help, and the chatbot confidently tells them the wrong eligibility requirements. Or a donor asks how restricted gifts are handled, and the “AI” invents a policy that does not exist. Or a volunteer asks where to complete onboarding, and the bot points them to an outdated form.
That is not a tech glitch. That is a trust problem.
AI hallucinations, when an AI chatbot makes up an answer that sounds believable, are becoming more common as nonprofits add AI tools to their websites. For mission-driven organizations, wrong answers create real damage: missed services, frustrated families, confused volunteers, and credibility risk with donors, partners, and funders.
That is why Telecom4Good built AI Assistants with one non-negotiable rule: they only answer from your nonprofit’s approved content. If it is not in your content, the AI Assistant will not guess.
In this post, we break down:
- Why many AI chatbots hallucinate
- Why public models like ChatGPT and Gemini can still get things wrong
- Why hallucinations are especially risky for nonprofits
- How Telecom4Good AI Assistants are built to prevent hallucinations
- What “no hallucinations” looks like in day-to-day nonprofit operations
Why Telecom4Good is speaking up about this
Telecom4Good supports nonprofits and NGOs worldwide, and we see the same pattern every week. Staff lose hours answering repeat questions, website visitors get stuck because critical details are buried across pages and PDFs, and internal teams spend too much time searching for the “right” version of a document.
Telecom4Good works with 400+ nonprofits and NGOs globally, and we have helped organizations unlock significant savings through nonprofit-first technology programs. We built our AI Assistants with the same mindset we apply to everything we do: reliability first, trust first, mission first.
The goal is simple: reduce repetitive questions, help constituents find accurate answers fast, and give your staff meaningful time back, without introducing the risk of made-up answers.
What “hallucination” means in a nonprofit context
An AI hallucination happens when a system produces an answer that sounds confident but is incorrect, incomplete, or invented.
The system is not “lying” the way a person lies. It is predicting the most likely next words based on patterns it has seen before. If it does not have the right information, many systems still attempt to produce a helpful-sounding answer.
On a nonprofit website, hallucinations often show up as:
- Made-up program details
- Inaccurate eligibility rules
- Incorrect hours, locations, or contact info
- Wrong instructions about how to apply
- Confident answers to sensitive questions that should be handled by staff
Common hallucination examples nonprofits cannot afford:
- A family is told they qualify for a service when they do not, or vice versa
- A donor is given the wrong donation method, deadline, or receipt guidance
- A volunteer is told incorrect onboarding steps or time commitments
- A visitor is directed to an outdated form or incorrect location
- A staff member repeats an invented answer to the public
Why many AI chatbots hallucinate
Most “AI chatbots” nonprofits encounter fall into two broad categories.
1 Scripted chatbots (decision trees)
These look like chat, but they are essentially flowcharts. They do not hallucinate in the AI sense, but they still mislead when scripts are outdated, too generic, or too limited for real questions.
The moment a program changes, a form link updates, or staff forget to maintain the flow, the chatbot becomes a confident source of wrong information.
2 Open-text chatbots connected to public AI models
These allow users to type anything and then pass the question to a broad language model. If the bot is not strongly grounded in your nonprofit’s content, it will often “fill in gaps” with plausible-sounding guesses.
That is the core problem: many bots are optimized to keep the conversation going, not to guarantee factual accuracy.
The simple difference: most chatbots are designed to respond. A Telecom4Good AI Assistant is designed to be correct, using only your approved sources.

Why tools like ChatGPT and Gemini can still hallucinate
ChatGPT, Gemini, and similar tools are powerful for drafting, brainstorming, and summarizing. Many nonprofit leaders and staff already use them internally to save time.
But they are general-purpose systems. They were not designed to be your nonprofit’s source of truth.
These models can hallucinate because they are trained to generate fluent answers even when they do not have enough verified information. They may blend patterns from the internet, assume “typical” nonprofit policies, or infer details that are not actually true for your organization.
Common ways public AI tools go wrong for nonprofits:
- They assume your eligibility criteria matches other nonprofits
- They invent steps in an application process that are not on your site
- They state hours, services, or processes based on outdated content or guesswork
- They produce confident answers to sensitive questions that require staff review
Public AI tools can be incredibly useful in the right context. The issue is when they are used as a public-facing answer engine for your nonprofit’s services and policies, without strict guardrails.
Why hallucinations are a bigger risk for nonprofits than most people realize
For nonprofits, accuracy is not just a brand issue. It is a service issue.
Wrong answers can mean missed support, delayed care, or families giving up because the process feels confusing. If someone is already stressed, a single wrong turn can be the difference between receiving help and walking away.
Hallucinations also create trust problems. Donors and volunteers expect clarity. Partners and funders expect consistency. If an AI tool invents details, your team ends up cleaning up confusion instead of delivering mission outcomes.
Finally, many nonprofits operate under real constraints: privacy expectations, safety boundaries, and compliance requirements. A hallucinated answer that crosses those lines can create risk you never intended.
Why Telecom4Good AI Assistants do not hallucinate
Telecom4Good AI Assistants are built differently by design. Here is what prevents hallucinations.
Trust & Safety checklist
(why this is safe for nonprofits)
What “no hallucinations” looks like in real nonprofit workflows
Here are three practical examples of how nonprofits use a Telecom4Good AI Assistant safely.
Program and eligibility questions (external)
A visitor asks, “Do I qualify?” or “What documents do I need?” The AI Assistant answers using your published eligibility criteria and program pages, and links to the correct forms.
If your site does not specify a detail, the AI Assistant clearly says so and directs them to contact your team.
Donor and volunteer support (external)
Donors can ask how to give, where to find receipts, or how to join a campaign. Volunteers can ask about time commitments, onboarding steps, and schedules.
The AI Assistant responds from your approved content and points directly to the right pages, reducing repetitive staff emails.
Internal staff knowledge base (internal)
Staff ask, “Where is the current volunteer handbook?” or “What is the intake process?” The AI Assistant returns the exact approved resource or explains the steps from your internal documents.
This reduces interruptions, improves consistency, and speeds up onboarding for new team members.
Want to see this on your website using your content?
Telecom4Good can train an AI Assistant on your existing website pages and approved documents and walk you through a live demo using your own content. You will see exactly what it can answer today, where your content needs clarification, and how quickly it can reduce repetitive inquiries.
Start with a 30-day risk-free trial, no pressure, just proof.
Suggested next steps:

